I don't think we want to comment, because it sounds like the facts are still unfolding.

We certainly don't agree with this particular verdict. The verdict was not based on all the available facts because those facts were not presented to the jury for their consideration. We will appeal.

The people of Fairfield have a right to know all the facts about the contract terms, amounts spent, cost overruns, who is responsible for additional costs and where the money will come from,

You're not a historian, but most historians will tell you that they make very discrete judgment as to what facts to omit in order to make their book into some shape, some length that can be managed.

Whatever happens right now, it has to happen.

To explode a myth is accordingly not to deny the facts but to re-allocate them.