I don't think it's at all realistic for them to get the EIS done before they deploy in August.

The most significant threats are posed by live fire because of its potential to cause wildfires ... As long as they are not going to fire any rounds, there's no conflict with the settlement agreement.

It's a difficult decision to make given the political climate, but she saw through the rhetoric and she focused on the facts and the law.

It's much cheaper for a landowner and community and for the environment for people to get the permits in the first place and comply with the permits.

Every settlement involves compromise, but here we have a very robust settlement. I hope it sends the message that it's cheaper to do it right and comply with the law the first time.

The Army certainly has known since fall of last year, fall of 2005, and perhaps as early as June of 2004 that there were chemical weapons being discovered at Schofield.