I do put my questions in terms of the sharpest polarities of the issue. But I don't want a preponderance of opinion over factual data.

You can have the greatest player in terms of mastering an instrument and you could be yawning your head off when you hear them. So, it's not what you do, but the way you're doing it and in the end that's all that we have.

What I want her to do is answer the basic factual questions then in the light of that we can review the position she's in.

In my opinion, there is one singular problem with religions in general: they are exclusive. To me, this exclusivity is not right.

If we have data, let’s look at data. If all we have are opinions, let’s go with mine.

You wouldn't expect her to be at her sharpest after that. But I suppose, on the other hand, she has hardly missed a dogfight for months and the other horse is more on the way up.