I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.

I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.

A fox should not be on the jury at a goose's trial.

Shocking writing is like murder: the questions the jury must decide are the questions of motive and intent.

To exclude all jurors who would be in the slightest way affected by the prospect of the death penalty would be to deprive the defendant of the impartial jury to which he or she is entitled under the law.

I'm no idealist to believe firmly in the integrity of our courts and in the jury system -- that is no ideal to me, it is a living, working reality.