I can assure you the letter was not related to the contributions he had accepted previously or following that letter. He does not do quid pro quo business.

If they've changed their minds and let us know they want to have their contribution back, we'd be glad to do that.

The congressman is very much opposed to doing a guest worker program before the federal government has proven it will enforce current laws first. There's a lot of divergent pieces of this puzzle. We're trying to get something together.

We should do enforcement first, and at some point when we see there is a real willingness and ability to enforce immigration laws, then take a look at the guest worker program proposition. We're talking a period of years.

If you're not going to offend somebody you don't need the First Amendment.

Maybe some of his decisions were a little misguided.