Good models are a combination of accuracy, attention to detail and finish. You never learn it all.

Mark's definitely a dual threat. He's got very good accuracy and he has deceptive speed. He can pull the ball down and run with it. He can gain a lot of yards in a hurry because he can flat get on down the road.

The chip is unique in what it does for a high-accuracy, high-availability developmental environment and tuning a power supply for optimum performance. It basically makes a power supply programmable.

It is the accuracy and detail inherent in crafted goods that endows them with lasting value. It is the time and attention paid by the carpenter, the seamstress and the tailor that makes this detail possible.

They're crying for someone to pay attention.

We've already seen the attention merchant's basic modus operandi: draw attention with apparently free stuff and then resell it. but a consequence of that model is a total dependence on gaining and holding attention. This means that under competition, the race will naturally run to the bottom; attention will almost invariably gravitate to the more garish, lurid, outrageous alternative, whatever stimulus may more likely engage what cognitive scientists call our ''automatic'' attention as opposed to our ''controlled'' attention, the kind we direct with intent. The race to a bottomless bottom, appealing to what one might call the audience's baser instincts, poses a fundamental, continual dilemma for the attention merchant-just how far will he go to get his harvest? If the history of attention capture teaches us anything, it is that the limits are often theoretical, and when real, rarely self-imposed.