DNA can't prove intent. You have cases where you already know who did it. The question is, when you take all the facts, what crime is that? First-degree murder? Second-degree? Manslaughter?

I've had cases where the lab simply cannot make a conclusion. The blood can get mixed with other things and deteriorate over time. On TV, the DNA evidence always comes back.

Most cases don't turn on DNA evidence. Most turn on eyewitness testimony and admissions by defendants.

We had the tempo where we wanted it and we were in the 1-and-1 already, and then we turn it over and miss some shots that we shouldn't have taken. I think we lost a lot of our aggressiveness at the offensive and defensive ends after that.

It was already on the ground when we got there,

DNA is an abbreviation for deoxyribonucleicantidisestablishmentarianism, a complex string of syllables.