Better to recognize that the problem from the scientific point of view remains open.

God's project of creation can be carried out through secondary causes in the natural course of events.

It is not correct... to stray from the field of science while pretending to do science. It only creates confusion between the scientific plane and those that are philosophical or religious.

If the model proposed by Darwin is not considered sufficient, one should search for another one.

If the model proposed by Darwin is held to be inadequate, one should look for another model. But it is not correct methodology to stray from the field of science pretending to do science.

We have a contract with them, so I don't see any problem. From our point of view, we don't have a problem. Tony (George) and I are discussing another five years after that.