Based on the facts of this case, the ruling is a misapplication, because the defense requested the continuance for their own reasons, not because of anything the state had or had not done.

Last year, our defense played a great game but we couldn't score. The only way we're going to beat them is if our offense can score. Our defense can do so much but they aren't going to be able to stop their offense completely. So we have to put more points on the board.

who don't recognize that each and every one of these cases have got their own separate facts, and they need to be evaluated based on facts.

I just told a couple of players, the first thing that sticks out on both offense and defense is that we were successful on third downs for the most part.

I think both teams played excellent defense. You can't take everything away from them. We tried to limit their 3-point looks and it opened up for some drives inside.

The defense held them to 10 points and stayed aggressive and attacked well.