All the arguments inserted in the standards are only found in the literature of intelligent design. Teaching the criticisms is teaching ID.

What this does is open the door for teachers to bring creationist arguments into the classroom and point to the standards and say it's OK.

It's clear from the beginning that this is not a real science discussion. This is a showcase for intelligent design. They have created a straw man. They are trying to make science stand for atheism so they can fight atheism.

They (state school board members) are allowing the intelligent-design minority to bypass the scientific community. While not specifically mentioning religious concepts, it's advancing a sectarian religious view. They're treading on some constitutional grounds here.

Furthermore, manufacturers and designers of backpacks often try to optimize design based upon the data available in the literature. Our shoulder loading data may help designers and engineers design a wide shoulder strap, for example, that will help spread the load of the backpack.

Furthermore, manufacturers and designers of backpacks often try to optimize design based upon the data available in the literature. Our shoulder-loading data may help designers and engineers design a wider shoulder strap, for example, that will help spread the load of the backpack.